Quick answer: Define an error-handling strategy — when to throw, log, or recover — and apply it consistently so failures are visible and handled predictably.
Inconsistent error handling hides the failures you most need to see. A standard makes them visible. Here is how.
How to fix it
1. Define the strategy
Decide when to throw, when to log, and when to recover.
2. Stop swallowing errors
Eliminate silent catches that hide failures.
3. Apply consistently
Enforce the strategy in review and lint so handling is predictable everywhere.
Catching the ones you can't reproduce
The hardest version of this to fix is the one you can't reproduce — it only happens on a player's hardware, OS, driver, or save state, under conditions that simply aren't present on your machine. A report that says “it crashed” or “it froze” gives you nothing to act on, so the bug survives release after release while quietly costing you players.
Automatic error capture closes that gap. Each failure arrives with its full stack trace, the device and OS, the build number, and a breadcrumb trail of what the player did right before it broke, so even a failure you have never seen becomes a specific, reproducible issue. Fold identical failures into one signature ranked by how many players each hits, and your worklist sorts itself worst-first instead of arriving as a stream of vague complaints.
This is where a tool like Bugnet earns its place. Its SDK captures every error automatically with the full stack trace plus device, OS, memory, build, and game-state context, folds duplicates into one grouped issue with an occurrence count, and ties each to the build it first appeared on — so you fix the problem that hurts the most players first and confirm it is gone when its signature disappears from the next release.
A crash you can name from its stack trace is a crash you can usually fix in minutes.